110 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
110 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
# Design Evolution Log
|
|
|
|
A chronological record of why significant design decisions were made. This is NOT a changelog. It records the product's evolution of thinking.
|
|
|
|
This document records discoveries, not decisions. Every entry represents our best understanding at that point in time and may later be superseded by a better model.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Phase 1
|
|
|
|
Simple conversational investigation
|
|
|
|
Question → Answer interaction.
|
|
|
|
Purpose:
|
|
Prove the reasoning loop.
|
|
|
|
Learning:
|
|
Conversation alone does not provide sufficient context during longer investigations.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Phase 2
|
|
|
|
Persistent investigation notebook
|
|
|
|
Added:
|
|
|
|
- current understanding
|
|
- original situation
|
|
- investigation history
|
|
|
|
Learning:
|
|
Users need persistent context rather than remembering previous answers.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Phase 3
|
|
|
|
Document workspace
|
|
|
|
Created a coherent workspace with:
|
|
|
|
- investigation status
|
|
- current investigation
|
|
- response
|
|
- understanding
|
|
- investigation map placeholder
|
|
- situation
|
|
- history
|
|
|
|
Learning:
|
|
The interface became usable but still behaved like a document rather than a workspace.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Phase 4 (Current Exploration)
|
|
|
|
Facilitated Investigation Workshop
|
|
|
|
Status:
|
|
Experimental.
|
|
|
|
Hypothesis:
|
|
|
|
The Confidence Engine is not:
|
|
|
|
- a chatbot
|
|
- a dashboard
|
|
- a form
|
|
|
|
It is a facilitated investigation workspace.
|
|
|
|
The interface should resemble the environment in which structured thinking happens.
|
|
|
|
Record discoveries rather than conclusions.
|
|
|
|
Leave room for future phases.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Phase 4 — Guiding Principles
|
|
|
|
The Confidence Engine is a workspace, not a document.
|
|
|
|
People think in multiple directions simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
Useful context should be visible together.
|
|
|
|
The interface should favour thinking over scrolling.
|
|
|
|
The workspace should feel like a large desk or workshop rather than a narrow report.
|
|
|
|
The engine facilitates thinking.
|
|
|
|
The user contributes evidence.
|
|
|
|
The workspace captures shared understanding.
|
|
|
|
## Current Open Questions
|
|
|
|
The following are active explorations rather than decisions.
|
|
|
|
- What is the right metaphor for the product?
|
|
- Should the workspace resemble a facilitated workshop?
|
|
- How should decomposition be represented?
|
|
- What information belongs in shared understanding?
|
|
- What should the Investigation Map eventually become?
|
|
- How should wide thinking be reflected in the interface?
|