Files
pedwfrontend/GUARDRAILS.md
Robert Bond 0de9268255 Merged PR 2242: Refactor: New Appeal flow structural cleanup (Slices 1–8, no behaviour change)
## Summary

This PR merges the completed new-appeal refactor stream (Slices 1–8) into SIPS-Development.

This refactor was executed in controlled slices with regression validation at each step.

## Scope

Structural and readability improvements only:
- XML/form derivation extraction
- payload and file helper extraction
- side-effect facade introduction
- BuildSection and BuildCheckSection decomposition
- BuildCheckRow formatter map refactor
- nested prop boundary cleanup
- start-flow cleanup (CreateCase / AboutYou)

## Behaviour

No intended behavioural changes.

The following were explicitly preserved:
- S78 journey behaviour
- payload shapes and field names/ids
- HASCAS mapping logic
- appellant/agent branching
- validation rules and messages
- redirect/query parameters (`lpa`, `apt`, `id`)
- navigation and side-effect sequencing
- EN/CY output parity

## Validation

Full regression has been performed on:
- start flow (CreateCase / AboutYou)
- save and resume flows
- file upload handling
- check answers rendering
- submit/finalisation sequence
- confirmation flow
- CRM insertion path
- EN/CY parity

Additional checks:
- docsOffline branch behaviour
- completion and partial-save email paths
- negative-path validation scenarios
- lint (warnings baseline unchanged)

## Risk

Low:
- changes are structural only
- no business logic changes
- no contract changes

## Rollback

Safe rollback via reverting this merge commit.

## Notes

This refactor reduces coupling and prepares the new-appeal flow for future appeal-type expansion.

Related work items: #22570, #22576, #22577, #22583, #22586, #22587, #22588, #22590
2026-04-13 13:09:12 +00:00

84 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown

# PEDW FrontEnd Guardrails
## Purpose
This document is a fast pre-flight checklist to reduce regressions in high-risk areas. Use it before coding, before opening a PR, and before merge.
## Non-Negotiable Guardrails
1. **Auth/session integrity**
- Do not bypass `next-auth` flow in `pages/api/auth/[...nextauth].js`.
- Preserve secure redirect behavior and cookie/session settings.
2. **Security headers and CSP**
- Do not weaken `middleware.js` CSP/header behavior or `next.config.js` security headers without explicit rationale.
3. **Data model safety**
- Treat `prisma/schema.prisma` as source-of-truth for auth/account persistence.
4. **Bilingual parity (EN/CY)**
- Any user-facing route/content change must validate both locales.
- Keep `i18n.js`, `locales/`, and `next.config.js` rewrites aligned.
5. **Public-service reliability**
- Avoid breaking core flows: search, case, account, myportal, admin.
## Sensitive Flow Protection
Apply extra checks for:
- `pages/api/auth/**`
- `pages/api/file/**`
- `pages/api/email/**`
- `pages/api/endpoint/*_api.js` handling account/user data
## Relay Hash Integrity Rules (CRM-bound APIs)
Apply when changing relay-bound portal endpoints and helpers (notably `pages/api/endpoint/**` and `actions/index.js`):
1. Keep relay endpoint configuration sourced from `API_ROOT`.
2. Preserve path-hash generation behavior:
- hash input must be request path/query (excluding domain),
- appended hash parameter must remain compatible with relay expectations.
3. Do not change hash algorithm/key usage contract without coordinated relay change.
4. Treat hash validation failures as security-relevant negative paths; verify graceful rejection handling.
5. Never log hash key material or sensitive request payloads.
Required for sensitive changes:
- Negative-path validation (unauthorized, invalid input, malformed payload).
- Safe logging (no secrets/tokens/personal data in cleartext).
- Explicit rollback steps.
## Relay Policy Change Guardrail (timeouts/retries/logging)
When changing shared relay forwarding policy (for example in `pages/api/middleware/relayForwarding.js`), treat this as an operationally sensitive change even if endpoint contracts are unchanged.
Minimum required before merge:
1. Complete the relay governance gate in `context/runbook.md` (Relay Hardening Rollout Playbook).
2. Attach non-prod smoke evidence for:
- deterministic non-retry classes (`400`, `401`, `403`, `404`)
- transient retry classes (`429`, `503`, timeout/network-transient)
3. Confirm structured redacted logging and duplicate-log suppression behavior.
4. Provide fast mitigation + rollback path (`RELAY_RETRY_MAX=0` and commit-revert path).
## Pre-PR Quick Checklist
- [ ] Ran `npm run lint` (or documented why unavailable)
- [ ] Verified changed routes/APIs manually
- [ ] Verified EN + CY behavior for impacted user-facing flow
- [ ] Performed accessibility smoke checks (keyboard, focus, labels, headings)
- [ ] Added risk notes (auth/data/i18n/a11y)
- [ ] Updated `memory-bank/change-log.md` for non-trivial changes
## If Assumptions Are Unclear
1. Record assumptions in PR notes.
2. Add unresolved items to `memory-bank/open-questions.md`.
3. Choose the safer behavior and clearly mark as temporary.
## Related Docs
- `.clinerules`
- `CONTRIBUTING_AI.md`
- `context/runbook.md`
- `context/integration-map.md`
- `memory-bank/README.md`